Criterion II

Criterion II

Criterion II - Teaching-Learning and Evaluation

Key Indicator - 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile

Metric No.	2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
2.1.1	Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years)
2.1.2	Average percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy ) during the last five years ( exclusive of supernumerary seats)

Key Indicator - 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity

Metric No.	2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
2.2.1	The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners.
2.2.2	Student - Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)

Key Indicator - 2.3 Teaching - Learning Process

Metric No.	2.3 Teaching - Learning Process
2.3.1	Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
2.3.2	Teachers use ICT enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process
2.3.3	Ratio of students to mentor for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year )
2.3.4	Preparation and adherence of Academic Calendar and Teaching plans by the institution

Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality

Metric No.	2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
2.4.1	Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years
2.4.2	Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Super speciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years
2.4.3	Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years

Key Indicator - 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms

Metric No.	2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.1	Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the last five years
2.5.2	Average percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years
2.5.3	IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes including Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) have brought in considerable improvement in Examination Management System (EMS) of the Institution

Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes

Metric No.	2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.6.1	Programme outcomes and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students
2.6.2	Attainment of program outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution
2.6.3	Pass percentage of students (Data for the latest completed academic year)

Key Indicator - 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey

Metric No.	2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
2.7.1	Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process